نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Based on a classical dichotomy, the Iranian legal system limits personal liability to “contractual” and “tort” liability, recognizing no middle ground. This binary division, especially in void contracts, leads to unfair outcomes where neither general contract rules can provide compensation nor tort liability can fulfill the injured party’s reasonable expectations.
Using a descriptive-analytical and comparative approach, this article examines the English legal concept of “proprietary estoppel” to evaluate its capacity as a solution to this gap. Findings show that proprietary estoppel, relying on “assurance,” “detrimental reliance,” and “detriment,” creates a flexible mechanism between contract and tort, offering a better solution for achieving justice in specific cases.
Furthermore, an assessment of Iranian law reveals that despite existing foundations and notable similarities in comparable institutions, none effectively fill the gaps caused by this classical liability duality. Finally, while criticizing this absolute dichotomy, this study proposes proprietary estoppel as an efficient model for rethinking legal rules, paving the way for its localization and breaking free from the rigid contract-tort division in the future.
کلیدواژهها English
