نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران
چکیده
قانون حاکم در دعاوی مالکیت فکری از جمله مباحث جدید در حوزة تعارض قوانین بوده و به تازگی مورد توجه دانشمندان حقوقی قرار گرفته است. طبیعتاً بسیاری از پرسش‌ها در این زمینه مبهم و محل نزاع دانشمندان بوده و پاسخ دقیقی برای آن نمی‌توان یافت. از جمله مباحث چالش‌برانگیز در رابطه با قانون حاکم در این دعاوی، قواعد حلّ تعارض قابل اعمال در این خصوص و به‌ویژه قاعدة «قانون کشور محل حمایت» است که بر مبنای اصل سرزمینی بودن به عنوان مهم‌ترین ویژگی، استوار است. با توجه به سابقة کوتاه طرح این موضوع در اسناد و مقررات حقوقی بین‌المللی، فقدان قواعد حقوقی مرتبط در حقوق ایران خالی از شگفتی است. در این مقاله به دنبال پاسخ به دو سؤال اصلی هستیم. اول این که به‌طور کلّی و با بررسی مقررات بین‌المللی آیا قاعدة کشور محل حمایت، یک قاعدة عمومی حلّ تعارض برای دعاوی مالکیت فکری است؟ در صورت مثبت بودن پاسخ، آیا چنین قاعدة حلّ تعارضی برای نظام حقوقی ایران به عنوان یک کشور در حال توسعه، مناسب است؟
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Lex loci Protectionis , Opportunity or Challenge?
نویسنده [English]
- Fatemeh Sadat Iravan Mohajeri
Ph.D., Private Law, Tarbiat, Modares University,Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The applicable law in intellectual property lawsuits is one of the new topics in the field of conflict of laws and has recently attracted the attention of legal scholars. actually, many of the questions in this field are still vague and controversial, and no precise answer can be found. One of the most challenging issues related to the applicable law in these lawsuits are the conflict of law rules and in particular “the Lex Loci Protectionis” which is based on the principle of territoriality as the most important feature. Moreover some new questions as to whether the territoriality principle is appropriate for transnational infringment of intellectual property rights were raised.Given the short history of this issue in international legal documents, the lack of relevant legal rules in Iranian law is no surprise .In this article, we seek to answer two main questions. in general, and in accordance with international regulations, is the Lex Loci Protectionis recognized as a general conflict of law rule for intellectual property lawsuits? If so, is such a conflict of law rule appropriate for Iran's legal system as a developing country
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Applicable Law
- Intellectual Property Lawsuits
- Principle of Territoriality
- Lex Loci Protectionis
- Iranian Law
- الماسی، نجاد علی. حقوق بین‌الملل خصوصی، چاپ اول، ( تهران: نشر میزان 1383).
- توسلی نایینی، منوچهر؛ جعفری، شهین. «کنوانسیون برن 1886 (حمایت از آثار ادبی و هنری) و مزایای الحاق ایران به آن»، پژوهش‌های فقه و حقوق اسلامی (فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی)، دوره5 ، شماره 17 (1388).
- جنیدی، لعیا. قانون حاکم در داوری‌های بین‌المللی، چاپ اول، (تهران: نشر دادگستر، 1376).
- حکمت‌نیا، محمود. «اصل سرزمینی مبنای نظری و آثار آن در نظام حقوق مالکیت فکری»، مجله حقوق اسلامی، شماره 48 (1395).
- عاشوری، مهدی. تعارض قوانین در مسئولیت خارج از قرارداد، با مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه، (تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه امام صادق (ع)، 1389).
- مقصودی، رضا. «عامل ارتباط محل سکونت عادی در قواعد حل تعارض اتحادیه اروپا و ایران»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، سال پنجم، شماره هجدهم (1396).
- کاتوزیان، ناصر، قانون مدنی در نظم کنونی، (تهران: انتشارات میزان، 1387).
References
Ansong, Alex. "The Concept of Sovereign Equality of States in International Law", Gimpa Law Review,Volume II (2018).
Asensio, Pedro de Miguel. Conflict of laws and the internet, edward Elgar (2020).
Asensio, .DE Miguel; Pedro, Alberto. The Private International Law of Intellectual Property and Unfair commercial Practices: Convergence or Divergenc? )Mohrciebeck, 2009).
Basedow, Jürgen. Intellectual Property in the Global Arena, Mohrciebeck, 2010
Bonomi, Andrea. Private International Law ,(Switherland, Sellier, 2007).
Carmel E, "Taxonomy of new software exporting nations", The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, Vo1. 3 (2003).
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,June 10,1985, also known as the "New York Arbitration Convention" or the "New York Convention".
Dessemontet, Francois. A European Point of View on the ALI Principles –Intellectual Property:Principles Governing Jurisdiction ,Choice of Law and Judgments in Transnational Disputes, Heinonline, 2004-2005)
Dinwoodie, Graeme B., "Developing a Private International Intellectual Property Law: The Demise of Territoriality?" William & Mary Law Review, Forthcoming; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 52 (2009).
Drexl, Josef; Annette, Kur. Intellectual Property and Private International Law: Heading for the Future, (IIC Studies, 2005).
Dutch Private International Law, The 2001 Act Regarding Conflictof Laws on Torts
Engelen, M van. "Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Matters of Intellectual Property", Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 14.3 (2010).
Eechoud, M Van, Choice of Law in Copyright and Related Rights, Alternatives to the Lex Protectionis, Conflict Rules for Modern Copy Right and Related Rights, (Kluwer Law International, 2003).
Eonsuk, kim. Cross Border Enforcement of Patent Rights Limits and Solutions in Current Conflict of Laws Regime, (Nagoya University, 2003).
Garcimartin, Alfareze; Farancisco J. The Rome II Regulation : on the Way Toward a European Private International Code, (Forum iuris Communis Europae, 2007).
Geller Paul, Edward. "Conflicts of Laws in Copyright Cases: Infringement and Ownership Issues", Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 51 (2004).
Ginsburg, Jane. "Private International Law Aspects of the Protection of Works and Objects Related Rights Transmitted Through Digital Networks", Colum Journal of Law and Arts, Vol. ???, 2015.
Haimo, Schack. "The Law Applicable to Unregistered IP Rights After Rome II", Ritsumeikan Law Review (2009).
.Hague Conference on Private International Law, Preliminary Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements.
Holden, Adam. "When in Rome (II): Jurisdiction, Choice of Law and Foreign Copyright Infringement in New Zealand Courts", Auckland University Law Review, Vol. 22 (2016).
Howard C. Anawalt. "International Intellectual Property, Progress, and the Rule of Law", Santa Clara High Technology Law Journa, Vol. 19 (2003).
Kono, T; Jurcys, p., Intellectual property and Private International Law,Comparative Perpectives, (Hart Publishing, 2012).
Kuipers, Jan-Jop. "Cartesio and Grunkin –Paul: Mutual recognition as a Vested Rights Theory Based on Party Autonomy in Private Law", European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. (2009).
Lipstein .K. (1981), "Principles of the Conflict of Laws,National and International,(The Hague/Boston/London"(, American Journal of International Law, Vol.77, Issue 3 (1981).
Lucas, Andre. Private International Law Aaspects of the Protection of Works and Subject Matter of Related Rights Transmitted Over Digital Network, (Wipo, 2001).
Ohly, Ansgar. Choice of Law in Digital Environment- Problems and Possible Solutions, ( Hart Publishing, 2005)
Patry, William. "Choice of Law and International Copyright", The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 48 (2000).
Pertegass Sender, Marta. Crossborder enforcement of patent rights , an analysis of the interface between intellectual property and private international law, (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Pryles, Michael. "Tort and Related Obligations in Private International Law", Collected courses of the Hague Academy in International Law,Vol. 2 (1968).
Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law
Applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) [2007] OJ L199/40.
Sender, Marta Pendegas. Cross border enforcement of patent rights an analysis of interface between ntellectual property and private international law, (Oxford, 2002).
Suthersanen, Uma. Utility Models and Innovation in Developing Countries, (International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), 2006).
Torremans, P. L. C., Intellectual Property and Private International Law, Eur. Intell. Prop. Rev, Vol. (2006).
Ulmer, Eugen. Intellectual Property Rights and The Conflict of Laws : A Study Carried out For The Commission of The European Communities,Directorate- General for International Market and the Conflict of Laws, (Springer, 1978).
)