- بیات، هادی، نادری، فاطمه، محمدیان و امید، رحیم‌پور، اعظم. (1396). «سیستم CRISPR-Cas و پیشرفت‌های اخیر در دقت عملکرد آن»، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جیرفت، دوره 3، شماره 1.
- پروین، محمدرضا و سیدین، علی، (1396) «فناوری ویرایش ژن کریسپر- کس 9 از منظر حقوق مالکیت فکری و ایمنی زیستی»، فصلنامه حقوق پزشکی، شماره42.
- پیلوار، رحیم و قضات، رضوان، آشنایی با حقوق اختراعات و اکتشافات نظامی، چاپ اول، (تهران: انتشارات شرکت سهامی انتشار ،1395).
- جعفرزاده، میرقاسم و محمودی، اصغر. (1384). «شرایط ماهوی حمایت از اختراع از نگاه رویه قضایی و اداره ثبت اختراعات»، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 42.
- شبیری زنجانی، سید محسن و نجفی، حامد، (1392). «مطالعه تطبیقی شرط ماهوی گام ابتکاری در حق اختراع»، دو فصلنامه حقوق تطبیقی، شماره 100.
- _____________________، __________، «مطالعه تطبیقی ارزیابی و احراز گام ابتکاری در اختراعات»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 15، شماره 4.
- صادقی، محمود و رمضانی آکردی، حبیب، (1394). «مطالعه تطبیقی مفهوم و آثار حق تقدم در حقوق اختراعات»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 19، شماره 1.
- میرحسینی، سید حسن، حقوق اختراعات، چاپ اول، (تهران: انتشارات میزان 1387).
- نصرآبادی، ابوالفضل، (1384) «شرایط ماهوی شناسایی حق اختراع: بررسی تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و موافقت‌نامه تریپس»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، شماره 51.
English Sources
- APO (Australian Patent Office). (2018). Manual of Practice and Procedure, available at: http://manuals.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/ Patent_ Examiners_ Manual.htm
- Arundel, Anthony. Barjak, Franz . Es-Sadki, Nordine. Hüsing, Tobias. Lilischkis,Stefan. Perrett, Pieter & Samuel, Olga. (2013). Respondent Report of the Knowledge Transfer Study, Empirica GmbH, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz and UNU-MERIT for the European Commission, DG Research and Innovation, , available at: http://knowledge-transfer-study.eu/fileadmin/kts/documents/kts_respondent_report_2012_v1.1.pdf
- Bagley, Margo A. (2008). “The need for speed (and grace): Issues in a first-inventor-to-file world”, The Berkeley Technology Law Journal, vol.23, no.1.
- BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), Zur Einführung der Neuheitsschonfristim, Patentrecht – ein USA Deutschand-Vergleich bezogen auf den Hochschulbereich, Bonn, 2000, Available at: http://www.uni-saarland.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Zur_Einfuehrung_der_Neuheitsschonfrist_im_Patentrecht_190607.pdf
- Bodenhausen, Georg H. C.. (1968). Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Geneva, Switzerland, BIRPI (United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property), available at: ftp://ftp.wipo.int/pub/library/ebooks/wipopublications/wipo_pub_ 611(e).pdf
- Bouchoux, Deborah E., (2013). Intellectual Property The Law of Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents, and Trade Secrets ,Fourth Edition, New York, Cengage Learning.
- Brickerhoff, Courtenay, "First-to-File Practice: An Alternative Interpretation of the Grace Period Shielding Disclosure Exception," Intelligence | Foley & Lardner LLP, accessed October 16, 2018, http://www.foley.com/first-to-file-practice-an-alternative-interpretation-of-the-grace-period-shielding-disclosure-exception-09-07-2012
- CIPO (Canadian Intellectual Property Office). (2017). Manual of Patent Office Practice, available at: https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/vwapj/rpbb-mopop-eng.pdf/$file/rpbb-mopop-eng.pdf
- Eisenberg, Rebecca S., (2000). "The promise and perils of strategic publication to create prior art: a response to Professor Parchomovsky", Michigan Law Review, volume 98, no. 7.
- Fromer, Jeanne C. (2008). "Patent disclosure", Iowa Law Review, vol. 94.
- G 0003/98 (Six-month period/UNIVERSITY PATENTS), EPO, Enlarged Board of Appeal, 2000. Available at: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/g980003ex1.html
- Gregory, Jack. (2016). “Grace Period Literature Review”, IP Australia Economic Research Paper. available at: https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/sites/g/ files/net856/f/reports_publications/ip_aus_-_grace_period_literature_review.pdf
- In re Katz 687 F.2d 450 (C.C.P.A. 1982).
- Joachim, Jordan. (2015). “Is the AIA the end of grace? Examining the effect of the America Invents Act on the patent grace period”, New york University Law Review, vol.90.
- JPO (Japan patent Office). (2011). The Japan Patent Office Annual Report 2011. available at: https://www.jpo.go.jp/shiryou_e/toushin_e/ kenkyukai_e/ annual_report2011.htm
- JPO (Japan patent Office). (2016). Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model in Japan. available at: https://www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e /t_tokkyo_e/files_guidelines_e/all_e.pdf
- JPO (Japan patent Office). (2017). Examination Handbook for Patent and Utility Model in Japan. available at: https://www.jpo.go.jp/ tetuzuki_e/ t_tokkyo_e/files_handbook_sinsa_e/all_e.pdf
- JPO (Japan patent Office). (March, 2015). Operational Guideline for Applicants to Seek the Application of Exception to Lack of Novelty of Invention. Corresponding to the Patent Act Article 30 Revised in 2011. available at: http://www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/pdf/e_pae_paa30/e_tebiki.pdf
- KIPO (Korean Intellectual Property office). (2007). Understanding the Patent Act of the Republic of Korea, Multilateral Affairs Division of KIPO. available at: http://www.kipo.go.kr/upload/en/download/Understanding_ the_Patent_Act_of_the_Republic_of_Korea.pdf
- KIPO (Korean Intellectual Property office). (2017). Patent examination Guidelines. available at: http://www.kipo.go.kr/upload/en/download/patent_ examination_guidelines_2018_01.pdf
- Kravets, Leonid, "First-To-File Patent Law Is Imminent, But What Will It Mean?", TechCrunch, February 16, 2013, accessed October 16, 2018, https://techcrunch.com/2013/02/16/first-to-file-a-primer/
- Metzler, Renee E., (2009). "Not All Grace Periods Are Created Equal: Building a Grace Period From the Ground Up", Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, vol. 13.
- Parchomovsky, Gideon. (2000). "Publish or perish." Michigan Law Review 98, no. 4.
- Robinson, Andrew Thomas. (2012). "The American Invents Act and the Best Mode Requirement: Where Do We Go From Here?", Journal of Intellectual Property Law, volume 20, no. 1.
- Roucounas, Emmanuel. (2006). "The debate regarding the grace period in international patent law: a reminder", ALLEA Biennial Yearbook.
- Straus, Joseph, Munich WIPO Open Forum on the DRAFT SPLT, Geneva: Grace Period—First Real Chance After Seventy Years, Mar. 3, 2006.
- Struve, Frederik W. (2013). "Ending Unnecessary Novelty Destruction: Why Europe Should Adopt the Safety-net Grace Period as an International Best Practice", William Mitchell Law Review, volume 39.
- T 0436/92 (Cutting tools/ACMC), EPO, The Board of Appeal, 1995. Available at: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/ t920436eu1.html
- T 0585/92 (Deodorant detergent), EPO, The Board of Appeal, 1995. Available at: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/ t920585ex1.html
- USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office). (2012). Examination Guidelines for Implementing the First-Inventor-to-File Provisions ofthe Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 77 Fed. Reg. 43,759. available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-07-26/pdf/2012-17898.pdf
- USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office). (2018). Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Ninth Edition. available at: https://mpep.uspto.gov/RDMS/MPEP/current
- Uview Ultraviolet Systems Inc. v. Brasscorp Ltd. 2009 FC 58, available at: https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/56406/index.do
)