Private Law Research

The Effect of the Link of Civil Cases to Extension of Justiciablity of Judgments In Iran and France: Emphasizing on Case-Law

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Mehdi Hasanzadeh 1
Badi`e Fathi 2

1 Associated Professor in Faculty of Law, Qom University

2 PhD Candidate of Private Law, Qom University

https://doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2018.26769.1692
Abstract
The link of disputes causes procedural dependence and connection between them. The dependence is sometimes so serious that requires to deal with the cases in all phases of proceedings as a whole. Disintegration of the cases makes the most serious problems in term of conflict of rulings and implementation of conflicting rulings. Disregarding this issue will result in some crisis in proceedings and may create problems for judicial system especially where the remedies of judicial system are not effective for reduction of issuing conflicting rulings or- as the case may be- for cancelation of rulings.  Accordingly, it is necessary to consider exactly if one of the concerned cases is justiciable and the other is non-justiciable, whether taking action against a justiciable one may be extended to the other one. In French law, article 39 of the Code of Civil Procedural gives positive answer regarding incidental cases and in the other cases resorted to non-dividablity. In Iranian law, the law is silent and it seems, in the case of "full connection", the cases are dividable in later phases of proceedings. In this regard, the legal obligation for simultaneous proceedings for concerned cases is also applicable to the later phases of proceedings.  The complaint regarding one case, therefore, affects the other case, too.
 

Highlights

-

Keywords

Full connection
non-ividability of cases
complaint of rulings
sufficient connection

-

 French Sources
 Vincent, Jean et Serge, Guinchard; Procedure Civile, paris, Dalloz, 26 ed, 2001.
Gerard, Cornu; vocabulaire Juridique, Paris, Dalloz, 1995.
Cadiet Loic; Reprtoir de Procedure Civile, Connexite, Dalloz, juin 2001.
Capitant, Henri; Vocabulaire Juridique, presse univrsitaire de france, paris, 6 ed, 1996.
Corniot.S; Dictionnaire de Droit, tome 2, paris, Dalloz, 2 ed, 1966.
Douchy-Odot Melina; Reprtoire de Procedure Civile, Demandere conventionnlle, Dalloz, Septembre 2003.
De paepe; Etudes sur la competence civile,T1, 1886.
Dworkin, Ronald Myles; Law's Empire, Harvard University Press, 1987.
T.R.S. ALLAN; Law, Justice and Integrity: The Paradox of Wicked Laws, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.29, No.4, 2009.
Cadiet; distinction entre les demandes incidentes et les demandes connexes, Civ. 2e, 7 juin 1989, JCP 1990!1.21470, obs.
Private Law Research
Volume 7, Issue 25
Winter 2019
Pages 35-58

Main Page

Editorial Boards

Guide for Authors

Contact Us