Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

When passengers or goods do not reach their destination at the agreed time, non-performance of timely transportation contract is executed. Agreed time may explicitly or implicitly listed on the ticket or from advertising of transpors or pubic news to be understood. League of Europe, United States and Iran has confirmed any rights of passengers as aircraft delays, cancelation of flight or ticket confirmation or additional capacity aircraft. To assimilate some of aviation regulations, Warsaw and Montreal convention have determined liability for damages in international flight. Both of convwntions discussed liability for timely transport flight. This research survived their responsibility attendant delays, cancellation of flights or additional aircraft capacity in European countres, Iran, United States and International law.

Keywords

 
 Dempsey, P.S. & S. O. Johansson, (2010), ''Montreal V. Brussels: the Conflict of Laws on the Issue of Delay in International Air Carriage'', Air and Space Law, 35, no. 3.
 Goldhirsch, L. B. (1988), the Warsaw Convention Annotated, a Legal Handbook, (London: Martinus Nijhoff).
 Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, Signed at Warsaw on 12 October 1929 ICAO Doc. 7838 (Warsaw Convention).
 Department of Transportation, Oversales and Denied Boarding Compensation, 73 Fed. Reg. (18 April 2008).
 Manual on the Regulation of International Air Transport, ICAO Doc. 9626, First ed. 1966, Second ed. (2004).
 Protocol to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, Signed at Warsaw on 12 October 1929, Done at the Hague on 28 September 1955, the Hague Protocol 1955, ICAO Doc. (7632).
 Protocol to Amend the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air, Signed at Warsaw on 12 October 1929 as amended at The Hague on 28 September 1955, [Guatemala City Protocol, 1971].
 Regulation (EC) NO. 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of February 11, 2004.
 Regulation (EC) No. 295/91.
 US DOT’s Oversales Regulations.
 Air France v. Lamour 1972 RFDA 47 (Cass. 10 Nov. 1971).
 Assureurs Divers c. Alitalia 1983 RFDA 153 (Trib. de comm. de Paris, 4 NOV. 1982).
 Bart v. BWIA Lloyds L. Rep. 239 (C. A. Guyana 1966).
 Cohen v. Varig, 380 N. Y. S. 2d 450 (N. Y. Civ. Ct. 1975) red’d390 N. Y. S. 2d 515 (App, Term, 1976 405.
 Ets. Peronny c. Sté. Ethiopian Airlines 1975 RFDA 395 (C. A. Paris 30 May 1975).
 Fret ET Transit Aérien c. M. E. A. 1979 RFDA 175 (Case, 9 Jan. 1979).
 Iran Air c. Cie. Generale de Geophysique 1975 RFDA 64 (T.G.I. Paris, 26 June 1973), aff’d 1975 RFDA 60 (C.A. Paris, 14 Nov. 1974).
 Mahaney v. Air France 474 F. Supp. 532 (D. C. N. Y. 1979).
 Prov. c. Montreal, 20 Sept. 1979 (1980 RFDA 215).
 Robert Houdin, c. La Panair do Brasil 1961 RGA 285 (Trib. Civ. Seine, 9 July 1960.
 Ruller Frères et al. v. Algérie 1956 RFDA 220 (Cass. 22 Feb. 1956).
 Tarar v, Pakistan International Airlines 554 F. Supp. 471 (D. C. Tex. 1982).
 Télé Montage et al. v. Air Canada 1976 Rec. de Juris, Cs 228, (Sup. Ct. Quebec, 1976).
 Tumarkin v. Pan Am 4 Avi. 18152 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1956).