Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor private Law at Gonbad Kavous University. Gonbad Kavous, Iran

Abstract

Issuing an award by the arbitral tribunal, having an impact on the whole proceeding, resolving a dispute, having jurisdictional character and finality of decision are the most important criteria in order to distinguish award from other tribunal decisions. Notwithstanding, beside these criteria, sometimes in this regard, it should be referred to award legal description has been done by the legislator. Although the first criterion is not particular one for recognition award but the second criterion has been used to recognize procedural order and, in this regard,, I think that Impact ability is enough. Indifference on the conception of dispute resolution has raised difference opinions on the nature of some decisions and types of award. When we use the jurisdictional character of decision either it refers to the judicial power of arbitral tribunal or to dispute resolution. Indifference on the conception of dispute resolution has raised difference opinions on the nature of some decisions and types of award. When we use the jurisdictional character of decision either it refers to the judicial power of arbitral tribunal or to dispute resolution

Keywords

-         امیرمعزّی، احمد،  داوری­ بازرگانی ­بین­المللی، (تهران: دادگستر، 1391).
-         جنیدی، لعیا، اجرای آرای ­داوری ­بازرگانی ­خارجی. (تهران: شهر دانش، 1381).
-         خدابخشی، عبدالله، حقوق داوری و دعاوی مربوط به آن در رویه قضایی، (تهران: شرکت سهامی ­انتشار، 1391).
-         خزاعی، حسین، «رای داور در حقوق داخلی و تجارت­ بین­المللی»، فصل­نامه­ حقوق دانشکده­ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، دوره­ 73، (1386)،97-126.
-         شیروی، عبدالحسین، داوری ­تجاری ­بین­المللی، (تهران: سمت، 1391).
-         کاتوزیان، ناصر، اعتبار امر قضاوت شده در دعاوی ­مدنی، (تهران: کانون وکلای دادگستری، 1368).
-         کریمی، عباس، آیین ­دادرسی ­مدنی، (تهران: مجد، 1386).
-         نیکبخت، حمیدرضا؛  شناسایی و اجرای آراء داوری­های ­تجاری ­بین­المللی در ایران، (تهران: شهر دانش، 1385).
-         ________________  داوری ­تجاری ­بین­المللی: آیین داوری. (تهران: شهر دانش، 1390).
-          قانون داوری تجاری بین­المللی مصوب 1376.
-          قواعد و آیین­ داوری مرکز داوری اتاق ایران مصوب 1386.
-       Arnaldez, J.-J., Derains, Y., & Hascher, D. (1997) Collection of ICC arbitral awards, 1991-1995 (Vol. 3): Kluwer Law International.
-       Bhatia, V. K., Garzone, G., & Degano, C. (2012) Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realizations: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
-       Brekoulakis, S. (2005)"The Effect of an Arbitral Award and Third Parties in International Arbitration: Res Judicata Revisited". Am. Rev. Int'l Arb, 16, 177-581.
-       Fouchard, P, Gaillard, E, Goldman, B, & Savage, J. (1999) Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on international commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International.
-       Harris, Bruce, Rowan Planterose, and Jonathan Tecks. (2008) The arbitration act 1996: a commentary, Blacckwell Publishing.
-       Lew, J.D. Mistelis, L.A., & Kröll, S. (2003) Comparative international commercial arbitration, Kluwer Law International.
-       Moses, M.L. (2008) the principles and practice of international commercial arbitration: Cambridge University Press.
-       Poudret, J.-F., & Besson, S. (2007) Comparative law of international arbitration: Sweet & Maxwell.
-        Rubino-Sammartano, M. (2001) International arbitration law and practice, Kluwer law international.
-       Schreuer, C.H. (2001) the ICSID Convention: a commentary, Cambridge University Press.
-       Turner, R. (2005) Arbitration awards: a practical approach: Wiley-Blackwell.
-       U.K. Arbitration Act 1996.
-       UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2013.
-       UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 and 2006.
-       Arbitration Rules of ICC 1998 and 2017.
-       Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010.
-       Swedish Arbitration Act (SFS 1999:116).
-       Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States).
-       Cour d'Appel de Paris (1re Ch. Suppl.) July 9 1992 – Société Industrilexport-Import v Société GECI et GFC", [1993] Rev Arb 307.
-       CA Paris, March 15 2001, Société Albert v Société Frabeltex [2003] Rev Arb 215.
-       Ste Industrial export-import v. Ste Geci and Gfi, Court of Appeal, Paris, July 9 1992 Rev. arb. 1993,301.
-       Société Opinter France v SARL Dacomex [1987] Rev Arb 479.
-       Brasoil v. GMRA, Cour d’appel [CA] [regional court of appeal], Paris, ch. 1, sec. 2, 1 Jul. 1999, case no. 98/24637 (Rev. Arb., 1999.834).
-       Publicis Communication v. True North Communications, Inc., 3 F.3d 725 (U.S. 2d Cir. 2000).