Mohammad Rasool Ahangaran; Seyed Mohsen Razavi Asl
Abstract
The administrative authorities deal with the mistakes and dispute in Registration of Documents and Estate, namely, the supervisory boards and the Supreme Council, including administrative courts that play an essential and important role in the outcome of the records. In this research , the current status ...
Read More
The administrative authorities deal with the mistakes and dispute in Registration of Documents and Estate, namely, the supervisory boards and the Supreme Council, including administrative courts that play an essential and important role in the outcome of the records. In this research , the current status of these references has been investigated and the reasons their inefficiencies are: Prolongation Checking the Files Send, Ignoring the principles of independence and impartiality, Disregard of producer tools and control tools in Impartiality in the said discretion ago, Lack of access to court for reasons such as lack of attention to the principle of the right to be heard, Has been analyzed and Finally, the necessity of reviewing the jurisdiction and scope of these authorities has been concluded the most important of these is the establishment of a Supervisory Board in all Registry Units, The creation of a new authority known as the Provincial Supreme Council of Document Records in the Provincial Document Records's General Offices and delegating the current powers of the Supreme Council of Document Record to the This Council and expanding the jurisdiction and duties of the Supreme Council of Document Records established by the State Register of Property and Documents.
Alireza Hasani; Amir masoud Fatemian; Ashkan Ashtian
Abstract
The supervisory board subject to Article 6 of the Real Estate Registration Law, as the authority for dealing with all disputes and registration errors, lacks the guarantees of a fair hearing, and the implementation of the current method is an insistence on inadequacies that do not contribute to the judicial ...
Read More
The supervisory board subject to Article 6 of the Real Estate Registration Law, as the authority for dealing with all disputes and registration errors, lacks the guarantees of a fair hearing, and the implementation of the current method is an insistence on inadequacies that do not contribute to the judicial situation of the country and the policy of decriminalization. . It is possible to take a step towards speeding up and facilitating the proceedings with minor reforms such as the expansion of delegation of authority, the formation of numerous and specialized branches, the revision of executive regulations and registration directives, but inadequacies such as the weakness of this quasi-judicial authority's entry into the nature Registration disputes and referral to judicial authorities (in cases where there is a threat of violation of acquired rights of individuals) are still standing. The first question of the article is why the supervisory board should deal with the errors and discrepancies in the registration. And in this regard, what are the justifications for the need for quasi-judicial authorities to enter into the nature of disputes? Secondly, assuming that the supervisory board (with its current status) does not have the ability to deal substantively with errors and registration disputes, what reforms and tools should be provided to the boards for the development of alternative dispute resolution methods?
