Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

A vertical agreement is an agreement between two or more economic entities, each of which operates at different levels of the commercial market. These agreements may contain non-price excluding terms that are contrary to competition law. One of the controversial issues in this regard is whether competition law will recognize non-price restraints on vertical agreements as detrimental to competition or not only does it not constitute a barrier to competition but also finds it useful in competition. The findings of the comparative studies show that non-price restraints on US and EU competition law are among the suspected restraints, however, due to the different approaches in competition law policies, the scope of inclusion in both legal systems is different. U.S jurisprudence has recognized it as independent restrictive arrangements and analyzes it under the rule of rationality. There are general and individual exemptions in EU law for the assessment of vertical restraints, which are declared legitimate if they meet the stated criteria. In Iranian law, the competitive approach to these restraints is ambiguous due to the lack of an explicit position, however, by relying on the general rules of competition law and the interpretation of Articles 44 and 45 of Law on Implementation of General Policies of Principle (44) of Constitution, we can find examples of restrictive procedures and agreements that can be adapted to these restraints in US and EU competition law.

Keywords

Ahlborn, Christian. »The Antitrust Economics of Tying: A Farewell to Per Se Illegality«, Antitrust Bulletin,  Vol. 49, Issues 1 & 2 (2004).

Allison, John R;  Prentice, Robert. Business Law, Thirteenth Edition (Texas, Forty Acres Press, 2012).
Bork, Robert. »The Rule of Reason and the Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Divisio«, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 75, NO. 3 (1966).
Buccirossi, Paolo. »Vertical Resttaints on E-commerce and Selective Distribution«, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 11, Issue 3 (2015).
Chayes, Abram. »The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation«, The Harvard Law Review Association, Vol. 89, No. 7 (1976).
Duns, John; Duke, Arlen, Competition Law Cases and Materials, Fourth Edition, (New York,LexisNexis: Butterworths, 2015).
Duns, John, Comparative Competition Law, first Edition, ( London, Edward Elgar Publishing: 2015).
Harrington, Joseph. »Horizontal and vertical agreements: Differences between the European Union and the United States«, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, Vol. 68 (2020).
HE Frech , WS Comanor, »The competitive effects of vertical agreements? «, The American Economic Review, Vol 75, NO 3 (1985).
Hovenkamp, Herbert. »American Needle: The Sherman Act, Conspiracy, and Exclusion«, Competition Policy International Antitrust Journal, vol. 786, (2010).
Landrigan, Mitchell,»Vertical Price and Non-Price Restraints in Australia and the US: A Comparative Analysis«,  Australian Business Law Review, No.312 (2017).
McKenzie, Baker. International Agency and Distribution Handbook, Sixth Edition (Chicago, Baker & McKenzie LLP, 2018).
Rosenblatt, Howard; Nilsson, Thomas, « The European Antitrust Review », Global Competition Review (2014).
Slade, Margaret , Lafontaine, Francine, »Exclusive Contracts and Vertical Restraints«, Journal of Economic Literature classification, L42, L81 (2008).
Van den Bergh, Roger J. Comparative Competition Law and Economics, First Edition, ( London, Edward Elgar, 2017),
Whish, Richard; Bailey, David, Competition Law, Ninth Edition (London: Oxford University Press ,2018.
Winter, Ralph A, Pil Choi, Jay, Competition Law and Economics, (Massachusetts, Edward Elgar, 2020).
پ) قوانین
America Invents Act (AIA).
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the EU
Federal Trade Commission Act.
Guidelines on Vertical Restraints 2010/C 130/01.
The Clayton Antitrust Act.
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890.
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
پ) پرونده‌ها
Cascade Health Solutions v. Peace Health, 515 F.3d 883 (2008).
Consten and Grundig v Commission of the EEC 56/65 Société Technique Minière (L.T.M.) v Maschinenbau  Ulm GmbH Cases 56/64 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig v Commission [1966] ECR 299.
Continental T.V. Inc. v GTE Sylvania Inc 433 U.S. 36 (1977).
FTC v Brown Shoe Co., Inc., 384 U.S. 316 (1966).
Guth v. Loft Inc, 5 A.2d 503, 23 Del. Ch. 255 (Del. 1939).
Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Edwin G. Hyde, 1984.
Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities,85/76, 1979.
Microsoft Corp. v Commission of the European Communities, T-201/04,(2007)-Northern Pacific Railway Company v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (1958).
Standard Oil Co of California v US 337 US 293 (1949).
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 97 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D.D.C. 2000).
White Motor Co. v United States, 372 U.S. 253 (1963).