Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Private Law, Shiraz University, shiraz, Iran

2 Professor at Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, shiraz ,Iran

3 Professor at Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Abstract: Articles 454 and 455 of the Civil Code are ambiguous in terms of the examples of the "right of rescission", the examples of "the implied condition of prohibition of the customer in the assignment" and the meaning of the word "void"; however, the supreme court decision as a unified judicial precedent No. 810 dated 24/06/2021is also vague and outside the scope of the lawsuits. A court has described the option of violation of the payment of installments and the delivery of the goods upon rescission as an implicit prohibition of the customer's assignment, and has ruled on the invalidity of the possessions and eviction. But in similar lawsuits, another court, from the terms of the same contract, did not describe such a concept, and with a different interpretation of the law, ruled against the seller. The supreme court emphasized the intent of the contracting parties in the case of the right to rescind the contract and return of goods sold, by commenting on an implicit matter, and did not comment on the legal status of the possession of the seller, and believes that the owner's right of priority does not invalidate the condition and the right of rescission against the return of the goods. While, according to the opinion of the majority of late and contemporary jurisprudents, deduced from Articles 454 and 455 of the Civil Code, the customer's right of assignment in the contractual right of rescission is dependent null. Thus, since the implicit matter of the return of goods sold and the request for eviction is based on the request for the cancellation of the assignment, the decision of the court is logically voidable.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abbas Karimi, Hadi Shabani Kandsari, “Legal Status “Mora’a” as a State within the Validity, Invalidity and Lack of Influence”, Private Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 47, Number 4, (Winter 2016) [In Persian]
Aghakhani, Abulfazl, “The concept and scope of judicial destruction of the subject of a contract with a view to the English legal systemˮ, Judicial Law Journal, Volume 85, Number 116, (1400). [In Persian]
Al-Sharif, Mohammad Mahdi and Jafari Khosrovabadi, Nasrallah, “Possession of the Object of Option in the Civil Code and Imami Jurisprudence (A study of the Bases of the Articles 454 and 455 in the Civil Code)ˮ, Islamic Law Quarterly, Volume 9, Number 33, (1391). [In Persian]
Ansari, Baqir, “Legal Ambiguity and Its Impact on Judicial Decisionsˮ, Legal Research Magazine, No. 43, (2018). [In Persian]
Begdali, Saeed and Hosseini Al-Mousavi, Seyyed Mojtabi, Tafsir al-Usuli Civil Code, first edition, (Tehran, Mehrsa Publications, 2015). [In Persian]
Emami, Seyyed Hassan, Civil Law, Volume 1, 21st edition, (Tehran: Islamia Publishing House, 2017). [In Persian]
Ghamami, Majid and Eshraghi Arani, Mojtabi, “Separation of judicial matter from thematic matter in civil proceedings, explanation of the general theoryˮ, Law Quarterly of the School of Law and Political Sciences, Volume 40, Number 2, (1389). [In Persian]
Hayati, Ali Abbas, “the Concept of the Legal Principle and its Comparison with the Legal Rule; A comparative study of Iranian and French lawˮ, two-quarterly Danesh Civil Rights Journal, 7th year, 2nd issue, 14 consecutively, (2019) [In Persian]
Hormozi, Kheirullah, “Entirely justified and guarantee fundamental civil unsatisfied evenˮ, Law and Politics Research Quarterly, Volume 6, Number 11, (2013). [In Persian]
Hormozi, Khairullah, “Legal Description of Facts and Its Importance in Proceedingsˮ, Law and Policy Research Quarterly, No. 28, (2008). [In Persian]
Hormozi, Kheirullah, Seyed Faridodin Takapoo, “Rational requirements of demand”, Private Law Research Quarterly, Volume 9, Number 32, (2019). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, Andishe and Ertegha, first edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library, 2007). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, Civil Rights, Mortgage and Solh, first edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh, 1370). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, Legal Encyclopedia, fifth volume, first edition, (Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications, 1358). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, One Hundred Articles in Research Methodology, First Edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh Publications, 2002). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, Elemental Science Culture, first edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library, 2002). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, the General Philosophy of Law based on the originality of action; Equilibrium theory, first edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library, 2001). [In Persian]
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad-Jafar, Mohashi collection, Civil law, first edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library, 1379). [In Persian]
Karimi, Abbas and Shabani Kandsari, Hadi, “An Attempt to Rewrite the Theory of Ineffectiveness of Mora’aˮ, Judicial Law Views Quarterly (Law Views), No. 58, (1391). [In Persian]
Katouzian, Nasser, Civil Law in the Current Legal Order, 5th edition, (Tehran: Daddgostar Publishing House, 1380). [In Persian]
Katouzian, Nasser, Validity of the adjudicated matter in civil litigation, 7th edition, (Tehran: Mezan Publishing, 2006). [In Persian]
Katouzian, Nasser, General rules of contracts, fifth volume, third edition, (Tehran: Publishing Sahami Enteshar in collaboration with Bahman Barna, 2013). [In Persian]
Katouzian, Nasser, General rules of contracts, third volume, third edition, (Tehran: Publishing Sahami Enteshar in collaboration with Bahman Barna, 2013) [In Persian]
Mohagheq Damad, Seyed Mustafa, “Analysis of Article 454 of the Civil Codeˮ, Judicial and Legal Journal of Justice, No. 9 (1372). [In Persian]
Mohagheq Damad, Seyyed Mustafa, General Theory of Terms and Obligations in Islamic Law, first edition, (Tehran: Islamic Science Publishing Center, 2008). [In Persian]
Portahmasbi, Mohammad and Mohseni, Hassan, “The principle of control of the parties to the dispute over the aspects and issues of the disputeˮ, the center's Bar Association magazine, No. 190, (2004). [In Persian]
Qasimzadeh, Morteza, Rahepik, Hossein and Kiaei, Abdullah, Interpretation of Civil Law, Documents, Opinions and Legal Thoughts, 1st Edition, (Tehran: Samt Publications, 2002). [In Persian]
Safai, Seyyed Hossein and Javaherkalam, Mohammad Hadi, Civil Law (Advanced), Debt guarantees, mortgages and guarantees, second edition, (Tehran: Publishing Sahami Enteshar, 1400). [In Persian]
Shams, Abdullah, Ebrahim Taghizadeh and Kamran Mirhaji, “Presentation of Facts and its Effects in Civil Actionˮ, the Judiciary Law Journal, No. 103, 2019. [In Persian]
Shams, Abdullah, “Reason, thematic matters and their description in civil litigationˮ, Journal of Legal Research, No. 65, (2013). [In Persian]
Shahidi, Mehdi, “Selling real estate without issuing an official documentˮ, Kanon, No. 91, (2008). [In Persian]
Nahrini, Fereydoun, The Nature and effects of contract termination in Iranian law, third edition, (Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library, 2010). [In Persian]
اصفهانی، محمدحسین، حاشیه المکاسب، جلد ۵، چاپ اول، (قم: ذوی القربی، ۱۴۱۹).
انصاری، مرتضی، کتاب المکاسب، جلد ۶، چاپ نهم، (قم: مجمع الفکر الإسلامی، ۱۴۳۷).
موسوی خمینی، سید روح‌الله، البیع، جلد ۵، چاپ اول، (تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی، ۱۴۲۱).
نایینی، میرزا محمدحسین، منیة الطالب فی شرح المکاسب، جلد ۳، چاپ اول، (قم: موسسه نشر اسلامی، ۱۴۱۸).
پ) فرانسوی
Cornu Gerard, Les principes directeurs du procès civil par eux-mêmes, Dans offertes à Pierre Bellet, Paris: Litec, (1991).
Fricero Natalie, Julien Pierre, (2014), Procédure civile, Paris: LGDJ, (2014).
Guinchard, Serge, Droit et Pratique de la Procédure Civile, Paris: Dalloz, (2018).
Motulsky Henry, “Le Rôle respectif du juge et des parties dans l’allégation des faitsˮ, in Ecrits et notes de procédure civile, préf. Cornu Gerard, Foyer Jean, Paris, Dalloz, (1973).