Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 phd student of praviat law/ tarbiat modares university

2 assosiate professor,faculty of law, tarbiat modares university

3 associate professor, faculty of law, tarbiat modares university

Abstract

Vicarious liability is one of the types of responsibilities arising from other's action. In US law, unlike Iranian legal system, there is a general rule upon which whenever under the control persons, commits a copyright infringement and thereby a financial benefit get to the supervisor, the latter, shall be subject to the vicarious liability. Undoubtedly, children are among the most prominent examples of persons under the control that this usually occurs by their parents. Furthermore, in Current age, it is possible that many infringements occur by children, especially in the Internet. Parents will generally be subject to the vicarious liability for copyright infringements their children. In US law,  has been suggested the probability of parental responsibility for  copyright by children based on the general rule of vicarious responsibility, while it seems that  the nature of the relationship between parents and children  and the bases of suggesting  parental liability for children's fault, demands some differences in this regard. Parental responsibility for children's torts in Iranian law, unlike US law, is based on fault and care rather than control and compliance, and this is an advantage of Iranian law.

Highlights

-

Keywords

-       Andrews,Rhonda V. Magee, "The Justice of Parental Accountability: Hypothetical Disinterested Citizens and Real Vitims' Voices in the Debate over Expanded Parental Liability", 75 Temp. L. Rev ,No 3, 2002,pp.375-443.
-       Atiyah , P S, Vicarious Liability in the Law of Torts , (London: Butterworths, 1967.)
-       Batholomew Mark and John Tehranian, "The Secret Life of Legal Doctrine: The Divergent Evolution of Secondary Liability in Trademark and Copyright Law",  Berkeley Tech. L.J. vol 21, 9(4),2006,pp.1364-1417.
-       Bridgeman Jo, "Accountability, Support or Relationship - Conceptions of Parental Responsibility",  Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 58 (3). pp. 307-24.
-       Bulloch Steven  N., "Fraud Liability Under Agency Principles: A New Approach", Wm. & Mary L. Rev.,27(2),1986,pp.301-330.
-       Cohen , Amy B., "Arising Under" Jurisdiction and the Copyright Laws", - Hastings L.J, vol 44, 1993,pp.337-398.
-       Conley , Chris, "Memorandum: Parental Liability for Copyright Infringement by Minor Children, Electronic Frontier Foundation", Nov. 1, 2005, At: http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/Parent_Liability_Nov_2005.pdf , pp.1-10
-       Davis v. E.I.DuPont De Nemours & Co., 240 F. Supp. 612 (S.D.N.Y. 1965).
-       Fairfax Stone Ferdinand, "Liability for Damage Caused by Minors: A Comparative Study", ALA. L. REV , vol 5, 1952,pp.1-59.
-       Fleming James Jr., "Vicarious Liability", Tul. L. Rev, 28(2),1954,pp.161-215.
-       Glass S, Wood, A. "Situational determinants of software piracy: an equity theory perspective",   Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11) , 1996, pp 1189–1198.
-       Greenwood Christine T., "Holding Parents Criminally Responsible for the Delinquent Acts of Their Children: Reasoned Response or “Knee-Jerk Reaction"?, J. CONTEMP. L.vol 23 ,1997, pp.401 and seq.
-       Grossman Craig A., "From Sony to Grokster: The Failure of the Copyright Doctrines of Contributory Infringement and Vicarious Liability to Resolve the War Between Content and Destructive Technologies", BUFF. L. REV, 53 (1), 2005, pp.141-268.

-       Halpern  Sheldon W., Copyright Law: Protection of Original Expression, (England :Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook Series, 2017.)

-       Horowitz , Karen, "Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?", 4 Shidler J. L. Com. & Tech, vol 4, 2008, pp. 8 and seq.
-       Lionel King Kimberly, "Torts - Liability of  Parents for Negligent Supervision of Their Minor Children- - Snow v. Nelson " , Fla. St. U. L. Rev,vol 12, 1985, pp.935 and seq.
-       M. Witmark & Sons v. Pastime Amusement Co., 298 F. 470, 475
-       Michael A. Axel, "Statutory Vicarious Parental Liability: Review and Reform", Cas. W. Res. L. Rev, 32(2) 1982,pp.559-593.
-       Paula Dalley J ,., "A Theory of Agency Law", U. Pitt. L. Rev.,72(3), ,2011,pp.495-547.
-       Dobbs Dan B. ,‎ Robert E. Keeton ,‎ David G. Owen ,‎ W. Page Keeton, Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (Hornbooks),(USA: West Group; 5th Packag ,1984.)
-       Religious Tech. Center v. Netcom On-Line Comm., 907 F. Supp. 1361 - Dist. Court, ND California.
-       Schepard Andrew, Parental Responsibility: The Columbine Aftermath, N.Y. L.J., , 1999,pp. 1 and seq.
-       Scott L. Wayne, "Liability of Parents for Conduct of Their Child Under Section 33.01 of the Texas Family Code: Defining the Requisite Standards of Culpability", 20 St. Mary's L.J., vol 20,1988,pp.69-92.
-       Sykes Alan O., "The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines", 101 Harv. L. Rev, 101(3),1988, pp. 563-609.
-       Tammy Thurman , "Parental Responsibility Laws: Are They the Answer to Juvenile Delinquency?"«, J.L. & FAM. STUD, vol 5, 2003, pp.99 and seq.
-       Tomaszewski L ,Amy., "From Columbine to Kazaa: Parental Liability in a New World", , U. Ill. L. Rev.  2005(2),2005,pp.573-600.
-       Weber Janelle A., "don’t drink don’t smoke don't download parent's’ liability for the children’s file sharing",Florida Law Review, Vol. 57, 2005, pp.1163-1199.
-       Weeks v. Sabo, 281 AD 2d 413 - NY: Appellate Div., 2nd Dept. 2001.
-       Wright , Charles S., "Actual Versus Legal Control Reading Vicarious Liabilip for Copyight Infringement into the Digital Millennium CopyrightAct of 1998",WASH. L. REv., 75(3), ,2000, pp.1005- 1036.
-       Yen , C Alfred., "Third Party Copyright After Grokster", Minnesota Law Review,vol 91, 2006. , p-,pp.180-241.
-        Zuckerman Mark & Devon Bush, "Memorandum: Parental Liability for Copyright Infringement by Child", Electronic Frontier Foundation, Oct. 24, 2003,pp.1-13.