syed hosein vaseghi; ghavam karimi; Mohamad Bagher Ameri nia
Abstract
The principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential to ...
Read More
The principle of prohibition of submitting a new claim in the appeal process is one of the governing principles in the court of appeals that is stipulated in Article 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Given the opposition between Articles 98 and 362 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is essential to effectively investigate the matter. In view of the French Code of Civil Procedure, the mentioned principle is compared in the Iranian and French legal systems. A comparative study of the two legal systems indicates that Article 564 of the French Code of Civil Procedure and the two subsequent Articles, after mentioning the said principle, specify the exceptions by pointing out the criterion. The criteria mentioned in similar instances can be generalized to reach a united criterion to be applied. After mentioning the said principle as an instance, Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure states the exception and asserts that the said instances cannot be taken as criteria and the instances under Article 362 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure should be viewed exclusively, judicial procedure has not reached the unity of procedure and the deficiency shall be amended through enacting appropriate regulations
Reza Shokoohizadeh
Abstract
Interest is one of the conditions of bring an action in court. This condition is not limited to first instqnce but is also necessary in appeal. But the question that which party holds the right of appeal is not an easy one to answer. Para. a of Art. 335 Civil Procedure Act grants the appeal right to ...
Read More
Interest is one of the conditions of bring an action in court. This condition is not limited to first instqnce but is also necessary in appeal. But the question that which party holds the right of appeal is not an easy one to answer. Para. a of Art. 335 Civil Procedure Act grants the appeal right to all parties of first instance. But the appealing of the winner party is not in accordance with the principles of law of civil procedure. In French Law, the Succombance Principle determines in which cases the parties could appeal the review of the judgment of first court. There are presumptions that specify the cases of appeal, condemnation in logic of the judgment and condemnation to compensation of costs of proceedings. But these presumptions are not inviolable. Consequently, it is necessary to study the application of succombance rule in deferent cases. In this regard, the application of succombance rule in respect of court judgment, parties and subject of the case would be studied in this Article. The research of French lawyers would be one of the sources of finding the solutions of cases of appeals in Iranian Law.
