SeyydAhmad Mousavi; Alireza Nojavan; Seyed Mohamad tagi Alavi
Abstract
The necessity of accomplishing the contract has been expressed in the form of the principle of irrevocability, the irrevocability of fulfilling the contract, fulfilling the covenant, holiness and compulsory of contracts, irrevocability and compulsory of contract. The purpose of all these principles is ...
Read More
The necessity of accomplishing the contract has been expressed in the form of the principle of irrevocability, the irrevocability of fulfilling the contract, fulfilling the covenant, holiness and compulsory of contracts, irrevocability and compulsory of contract. The purpose of all these principles is summarized in the contract and becomes a binding force as soon as it is created, to which the parties participating are bound by its provisions. In jurisprudence and Iranian law, the pacta sunt servanda is interpreted as the principle of the irrevocability of contracts. the pacta sunt servanda has been accepted in jurisprudence and Iranian law. The principle of irrevocability is different from that of the pacta sunt servanda. From 219 of the Civil Code, some have inferred the principle of irrevocability in the position of doubt in the revocability and irrevocability of contracts, and others have inferred the pacta sunt servanda of absolute contracts, both revocable and irrevocable. This article tries to identify the pacta sunt servanda in Iranian law, provisions, concepts, and sources and explain its differences with the principle of irrevocability and similar principles in Iranian law, jurisprudence, and foreign law
alireza ibrahimy
Abstract
legislators in both countries Afghanistan and Iran have provided that, happening unavoidable external event is a cause for non-responsibility that Force major is one type of the event. Now considering effect of the event on obligator’s responsibility and also natural difference between omission ...
Read More
legislators in both countries Afghanistan and Iran have provided that, happening unavoidable external event is a cause for non-responsibility that Force major is one type of the event. Now considering effect of the event on obligator’s responsibility and also natural difference between omission and positive obligations, we must to answer this, has the difference what effect on the destiny of the obligation and basis of non-responsibility. According to this, this paper by referring library resources and using analytic-description methods tries to specify the answer for the questions. By precise analyzing and general legal rules and jurisprudence, how the effect of the force major on breaking omission obligation is different than positive one and for this reason, the basis of non-responsibility is the removal of obligation and in result, lack of necessary conditions for establishing responsibility in contractual liability. also by happening the force major, the obligation is suspended or the contract is terminated. In this situation, by the basis, the consideration for none-performance of contract is claimable against where it is provided for delay in performance of the contract, if the force major take places.
