Private Law
Jafar Shahand; Ebrahim TaghiZadeh; Abolghasem Naghibi
Abstract
Based on the famous opinion of jurists And the majority of lawyers, the first principle in seizures on other property is based on the guarantee possession And all kinds of domination over the people's property have been condemned to liability of unlawful possession and the order of special rules of usurpation ...
Read More
Based on the famous opinion of jurists And the majority of lawyers, the first principle in seizures on other property is based on the guarantee possession And all kinds of domination over the people's property have been condemned to liability of unlawful possession and the order of special rules of usurpation considering the pure obedience of the legislator in enacting Articles 301 to 327 of the civil law, accepting the well-known opinion of the jurists in a general or general manner, this extremist view has been seriously criticized by the commentators of the civil law. And basically, the application of the rules of usurpation to non-aggression, in which the basis of possession and domination is based on ignorance of truth and error and lack of malice, is in clear opposition to the principles and rules of justice and fairness and the requirement of the principle innocence. Therefore, in this article an attempt has been made with the help of scattered jurisprudential and legal opinions and related legal materials in order to modify the popular opinion and explain the responsibility of non-aggressors based on the use of other sources of coercive guarantee take a step.
mohammadreza kaykha; alireza abin
Abstract
Respect for property is one of the legal rules of law, and unlawful domination or unjust harm will render the offender liable. The intentional look and the importance of safeguarding the financial rights of individuals in the community and ensuring their rights in this area has led the legislator to ...
Read More
Respect for property is one of the legal rules of law, and unlawful domination or unjust harm will render the offender liable. The intentional look and the importance of safeguarding the financial rights of individuals in the community and ensuring their rights in this area has led the legislator to adopt rigorous policies in the field, one of which is the crystallization of the rule of crystallization. Has found. As to the validity of this rule (relative to the ignorant or ignorant ruler), at least two competing currents of absolutism can be deduced from Imamiyah, Sunni, and Iranian law: In one sense, this rule is completely invalid and, with the new principles of civil liability The conflict is obvious. On the other hand, the validity of this rule is a matter of jurisprudence and law and its social necessities are backed. This descriptive-analytical study shows that in analyzing this rule one should choose the middle way and based on the presence or absence of a good intent element in the unauthorized occupant, a proper and proper conduit for the flow of the rule. The phenomena in which Sunni jurisprudence has been traced back to it have referred to the judgmental
mohammad bafahm; Azizollah Fahimi
Abstract
Article 11 of civil liability code has recognized the civil liability of the state , but this article does not explain clearly the realization of usurpation liability . The present study seeks to answer this question that if the state have had illegal domination on others property whether it can realize ...
Read More
Article 11 of civil liability code has recognized the civil liability of the state , but this article does not explain clearly the realization of usurpation liability . The present study seeks to answer this question that if the state have had illegal domination on others property whether it can realize the usurpation liability ? Some have hesitated about the possibility of usurpation liability to the state and they regarded the analogy of the state possessions with real persons possessions as an irrelevant analogy . In this writing after explaining and examining the basis of the view , in addition , analysis of court judgments we will conclude that there is the possibility of realization of usurpation liability to Illegitimate possessions of the state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
