Legal Regime of Indirect Patent Infringement: A
Comparative Study
Badini
Hasan
Associate Professor in Private Law of University of Tehran
author
Najafi
Hamed
Ph.D. Student in Private Law of Tarbiat Modares University
author
text
article
2017
per
According to the doctrine of indirect infringement, anyone who provides the causesof infringement or facilitate its occurrence will be liable for compensation for indirectinfringement of patent rights, including contributory and inducing infringement. Civilliability arising from the indirect infringement, based on fault, is created if there is adirect infringement of the act or omission.There is no such entity in Iranian patentlaw, but by referring to some other laws, it could result in a sentence against theindirect infringer. However, if there is interest, the adoption of a specific rule issuggested in this field. Since Iran is a developing country, the authors of this paperbelieve that such an interest is not considered. The main questions posed in this articleare: What are the requirements of the indirect infringement and what is the positionof Iranian law in this respect? By conducting a comparative study under legal systemsof generally developed countries and by placing a particular emphasis on the US Lawand related case laws as the origin of this institution, this article discussesrequirements of the indirect infringement and accordingly presents the position ofIranian law and appropriate proposals.
Private Law Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2345-3583
5
v.
18
no.
2017
9
42
https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_7401_a53825f200e222638a7b5ce6731f6864.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2017.7401
Civil Liability of Violation of Data Privacy in Imamieh Jurisprudence and statutory law
Ali
Jafari
Assistant Professor, University of Tehran
author
Mohammad Reza
Rahbarpour
Assistant Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University
author
text
article
2017
per
The importance of the violation of data privacy is due to technological developmentsand possibility of more violation of privacy. Civil liability of violating data privacyis more complicated than civil liability of evading other subjects of privacy such ascorporeal or physical privacy, locative privacy and communications privacy. Thisarticle, despite other subjects, discusses exploitation of the issue and annihilation ofdata privacy. Some lawyers believe in ownership of data privacy. These two issues(annihilation of data privacy and considering data privacy as property), turn thedirection of discussions about civil liability of evading data privacy.The present paperrepresents the concept of data privacy and discusses the three bases of civil liabilityof violating data privacy. In addition, ownership theories and annihilation of dataprivacy and also the effect of these two issues on civil liability of violating dataprivacy will be investigated. Finally, we study data privacy torts, civil wrongs whichcause civil liability of data privacy violation.
Private Law Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2345-3583
5
v.
18
no.
2017
43
74
https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_7404_81247a8453e2d81545c31bd3cadc1ebb.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2017.7404
Fraudulent Demand for Payment of Bank Guarantee with
an Emphasis on the UNCITRAL Convention on
Independent Guarantees and Letter of Credit
Guarantee
Majid
Sarbazian
Assistant Professor of Shiraz university
author
Seyyed Raza
Hashemi
M. A in Private Law of Shiraz university
author
text
article
2017
per
Bank guarantees are one of the most effective international instruments used incommercial contracts. Without bank guarantees, it would not be possible to fulfilobligations of the parties or the parties would encounter potential risks. Bankguarantees provide the beneficiary with a certain and immediate payment of awealthy sponsor in his country. The only exception to the principle of independenceis the issue of fraud, which has universally been recognised. This exception couldprevent claim and payment to beneficiaries. The question addressed in this articleis: What are the international rules on the issue of fraud in bank guarantees and whatmeasures have been taken by the UN Convention on Independent Guarantees andCredit Guarantees ? International Chamber of Commerce has been silent on thisissue or at least has not dealt with it expressly . However, the aforementionedConvention is the only document that contains provisions regarding fraud, eventhough it does not provide an exhaustive list and exact details. It neverthelessprovides a useful guidance for courts.
Private Law Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2345-3583
5
v.
18
no.
2017
75
101
https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_7405_991ec24d1d3152cb4dbb76dc4bd04219.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2017.7405
Stabilization Clauses in State Contracts
Mohammad
Shamsayi
استادیار حقوق بین الملل سرمایه خارجی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
author
text
article
2017
per
شرط ثبات در قراردادهای دولتی یکی از راههای تنظیم و تضمین منافع سرمایهگذاران خارجی است. علیرغم عدم مقبولیت اینگونه شروط در میان دولتهای جهان سوم و نیز دولتهای درحالتوسعه، محبوبیت و مقبولیت این شروط در کشورهای توسعهیافته منجر به این امر شده است که سرمایهگذاران خارجی، جذابیت دولتهای سرمایهپذیر را بر اساس ثبات در نظام تقنینی و تنظیمی این دولتها میدانند. بااینحال تنها راه تضمین این ثبات پیشبینی شروطی در قراردادهای دولتی است که اصطلاحاً شرط ثبات نامیده میشوند. ازاینرو مقالهی پیشِ رو پس از بین تاریخچه و مفهوم این شرط، به بررسی انواع گوناگون آن میپردازد. همچنین درجات مختلف این شروط بسته به هر نظام حقوقی و مطابق با موضوعات سرمایهگذاری ممکن است تغییراتی داشته باشند. اعتبار این شروط نیز در نظامهای حقوقی ملی و بینالمللی مورد توجه حقوقدانان میباشد که موضوع بخش پایانی نوشتار حاضر است.
Private Law Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2345-3583
5
v.
18
no.
2017
103
130
https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_7408_cb1f14279882c9458b4c77c776c9ce97.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2017.7408
Ownership of oil in international oil contracts from the perspective of private law
Abbas
Kazemi Najafabadi
استادیار حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
author
text
article
2017
per
The determination of time and place of transfer of ownership is one of the most challenging issues in international oil contracts. In oil contracts, on the one hand, the host State usually chooses its own national law as the applicable law, but on the other hand, foreign companies are usually affected by Common Law due to history of oil contracts. In Common Law, the transfer of ownership depends on mutual agreement, but in Iranian law, the transfer of ownership depends on legislation and it may be different based on type of contract. Most oil-rich countries consider Common Law solution based on consensus, however, in Iranian legal system, there is a need for a statute which does not currently exist as a result of repealing the previous petroleum Act. Therefore, it should be noted that in the current legal state, the determination of time and place of transfer of ownership in oil contracts, particularly in production sharing and concession contracts, is void and ineffective.
Private Law Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2345-3583
5
v.
18
no.
2017
131
165
https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_7421_8ee45b0345a421fae6e37e19512ac116.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2017.7421
Connecting Factor of Habitual Residence at EU and Iranian Conflicting Rules
رضا
مقصودی
استادیار دانشگاه گیلان
author
text
article
2017
per
Connecting Factor of Habitual Residence at EU and Iranian Conflicting Rules In EU Law, habitual residence is an important connecting factor in relation to conflict of forums and conflict of laws, particularly in personal matters. EU rules and regulation, which are enforceable directly and without a need for approval of domestic bodies, regularly consider this connecting factor and replace traditional connecting factors such as domicile in Common Law and nationality in Civil Law countries. The recognition of the objective factor of residence, the domicile, increases predictability in international relationship. At same time, a close relationship between persons and applicable law provides flexibility regarding conflict of law rules, and unlike the criterion of nationality, it prevents absolute application of rules of a specific country . Moreover, by applying the habitual residence factor, courts are often referred to material rules of Lex Fori and therefore, they are not concerned with problems of proving foreign law.
Private Law Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2345-3583
5
v.
18
no.
2017
157
197
https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_7422_723c31fdfc65c99ef832eceb3af34111.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2017.7422