Abstract
Existing a foreign interest in a case of bankruptcy – such as different nationalities of debtors and creditors or existing goods in the other country or having an agency in the second country - provides a doubt on what is the applicable law? This doubt can be separated to tow branches: what is ...
Read More
Existing a foreign interest in a case of bankruptcy – such as different nationalities of debtors and creditors or existing goods in the other country or having an agency in the second country - provides a doubt on what is the applicable law? This doubt can be separated to tow branches: what is the applicable procedure law and what is thesubstantive applicable law and what is bankruptcy and insolvency? This research is concerned about the second branch. But in Iranian Codes and jurisdictions there is not any conflict regulars with regard to this situation. In some treaties and foreign doctrines have been provided some usable results. For this legal shortage, we need to provide a doctrine which is in harmony with the other Iranian conflict regulars to be accepted by our legal system.
Alireza Fasihizadeh
Abstract
In Iranian law, the declaration of insolvency is treated as "insolvency action". Thus, it is reasonable to expect that this action complies with the principles of trial and the legal rules. The fact is that the non-compliance with the fundamental principles is a violation of judgment. However, ...
Read More
In Iranian law, the declaration of insolvency is treated as "insolvency action". Thus, it is reasonable to expect that this action complies with the principles of trial and the legal rules. The fact is that the non-compliance with the fundamental principles is a violation of judgment. However, by examining existing rules and regulation, it becomes clear that in insolvency action proceedings and the decree of insolvency, many principles of trial and general legal rules are not abided by. After a brief introduction of the insolvency action and its governing law, this paper examines the instances of legislator's ignorance and pertinent reasons . In the insolvency action, the legislator has been renounced of the principles such as persons’ insolvency, financial claim disputes, correlation of permission to thing with permission to its concomitants, authority of res judicata, competence of court of domicile, and rules such as kinsman’s liability, privity of judgments, the validity of the judgment and insolvent’s compliance with bankruptcy system.
mohammad hasan sadeghi moghadam; mojtaba shafie zadeh khulenjani
Volume 3, Issue 9 , December 2015, , Pages 101-122
Abstract
Abstract The creditor is entitled to collect the debt from the debtor. The possibility of collecting the debt through the debtor’s body organs is a disputable issue. By explaining different ways of collecting the debt from the defaulting debtor, such as compelling him to pay his debt, the ...
Read More
Abstract The creditor is entitled to collect the debt from the debtor. The possibility of collecting the debt through the debtor’s body organs is a disputable issue. By explaining different ways of collecting the debt from the defaulting debtor, such as compelling him to pay his debt, the court’s order for the payment of the debt from the debtor’s property, imprisonment and the rules relating to insolvency, this article examines the possibility of collecting the debt from the debtor’s body organs. The issue is whether human being has such a control over his body organs for marketability of these organs and to transfer them. By taking into consideration the fact that the body organs have market value and human being have dominion, but not ownership, over their body organs, it can be concluded that the body organs are not part of the debtor’s property. Thus, it is not possible to compel the debtor to cut his body organs for the payment of his debt. It is not also possible to cut his body organs in return for his debt when he is dead. But if the dead’s organs are sold, they can be given in place of his debt.
